Fish Restoration Program Tidal Wetland Restoration Monitoring in Upper San Francisco Estuary, 2015-ongoing
The Fish Restoration Program Monitoring Team assesses the biological effectiveness of 8,000+ acres of tidal wetland restoration in the Upper San Francisco Estuary (Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Marsh) through a contract with the CA Department of Water Resources. The restoration is pursuant to requirements in the 2008/2009, 2019, and 2024 Biological Opinions for state and federal water project operations. Data on fish and invertebrate abundance on or near these sites was collected as baseline monitoring data and to determine the most efficient methods for monitoring wetlands. Understanding how invertebrate, fish, and phytoplankton communities change pre- to post-restoration is essential to evaluating the benefits of tidal wetlands to native fish species. Invertebrate data was collected using sweep nets, benthic cores, neuston nets, and zooplankton trawls. Fish data was collected using otter trawls, lampara nets, and beach seines. For each method, the team recorded the catch of fish, invertebrates, and other organisms, length of selected organisms, and a suite of environmental information, including: dissolved oxygen, water temperature, pH, specific conductance, turbidity, chlorophyll a, phycocyanin, and dissolved organic carbon. Additional water quality samples, processed for Chlorophyll a, Dissolved Ammonia, Dissolved Nitrite + Nitrate, Dissolved Organic Carbon, Dissolved Organic Nitrogen, Dissolved Ortho-phosphate, Pheophytin a, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Total Organic Carbon, Total Phosphorus, and Total Suspended Solids, were collected at a subset of sampling sites. Data are collected before and after restoration at project and reference sites (Before-After-Control-Impact design), as well as at adjacent water bodies. Before restoration, projects were either nontidal or had limited tidal exchange. ## About This Federated Record This CNRA Open Data Platform record is based on metadata federated from the Environmental Data Initiative (EDI) Data Portal. Its purpose is to improve the discoverability of the data package through the CNRA Open Data Platform. The EDI Data Portal is the repository of record for this data package. Metadata, resource links, and supporting information displayed here may not reflect the latest updates available in EDI. Resources shown here—including Full Metadata, Provenance, and Data Quality Report—are provided to help users understand and evaluate the data package and the supporting information available from EDI. For the current data package, citation, DOI, data files, metadata, provenance, data quality documentation, revision history, and other supporting information, refer to the EDI data package landing page: https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/metadataviewer?packageid=edi.269.6&key=vqSpNwnbe91Bi8trB5RY25CoPD4 Access requirements, permissions, and authorization policies for resources hosted by EDI are established and managed independently of the CNRA Open Data Platform.
Data files
Supporting files
| Data title and description | Access data | File details | Last updated |
|---|---|---|---|
FRP_orglookup Table of taxonomic information for organisms caught in mesozooplankton, macroinvertebrate, and fish samples. | CSV (EXTERNAL DOWNLOAD) | 09/25/26 | |
sitevisit_FRP2024 A site visit is a field data collection event. At each site visit, one or more samples may be collected. A site visit connects to samples in the macrozooplankton, zooplankton, or fish tables, via the VisitNo variable. Commonly, the site visit file will be merged with the macroinvert, zoops, or fish data files. This is a 1 to many merge, with VisitNo as the key variable. For example, in R, newdatafile<-merge(zoops_FRP2021, sitevisit_FRP2021, by=VisitNo). All samples are associated with a site visit, a site visit may have zero to many samples. | CSV (EXTERNAL DOWNLOAD) | 09/25/26 | |
zoops_FRP2024 Mesozooplankton trawl data, including sample and catch data. CPUEs are reported for each taxon. To calculate the total CPUE for each sample, sum the CPUEs for individual taxa. Typically, there is one observation (row) for each taxonomic group within a sample, but occasionally, the subsampling was changed during processing and there are two observations (rows) for a single taxonomic group within the sample. | CSV (EXTERNAL DOWNLOAD) | 09/25/26 | |
macroinvert_FRP2024 Contains sample and catch data for macroinvertebrate samples. Macroinvertebrate samples include all gear types with mesh size of 500 microns, including trawls, benthic samples, and samples taken in vegetation. To calculate the total CPUE for each sample, sum the CPUEs for individual taxa. Typically, there is one observation (row) for each taxonomic group within a sample, but occasionally, the subsampling was changed during processing and there are two observations (rows) for a single taxonomic group within the sample. | CSV (EXTERNAL DOWNLOAD) | 09/25/26 | |
fish_FRP2024 Contains sample and catch data for fish samples. Typically, there is one observation (row) for each measured fish within a sample in addition to an observation (row) with a plus count (for non-measured individuals of a species). Total CPUE can be calculated by summing the individual catches, dividing by effort, and multiplying by 10,000 to get the number of fish per 10,000 m^3. There was likely confusion over naming conventions in the field for the genus Palaemon vs the old genus name Palaemonetes. This may have resulted in misidentification of Palaemon species prior to 2023. | CSV (EXTERNAL DOWNLOAD) | 09/25/26 | |
nutrients_FRP2024 Contains sample and lab data for nutrient samples. Analytes include Chlorophyll a, Dissolved Ammonia, Dissolved Nitrite + Nitrate, Dissolved Organic Carbon, Dissolved Organic Nitrogen, Dissolved Ortho-phosphate, Pheophytin a, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Total Organic Carbon, Total Phosphorus, and Total Suspended Solids. | CSV (EXTERNAL DOWNLOAD) | 09/25/26 | |
phyto_FRP2024 Contains sample and catch data for phytoplankton samples. There is typically one observation (row) for each measured phytoplankton cell or natural unit within a sample. CommonNames may be repeated in a sample, because two different taxa originally assigned by the contractor were assigned the same CommonName. | CSV (EXTERNAL DOWNLOAD) | 09/25/26 | |
Monitoring SOPsv1.3 Contains detailed Standard Operating Procedures for field and lab data collection, including gear specifications. | PDF | 09/25/26 | |
Provenance Metadata This method step describes provenance-based metadata as specified in the LTER EML Best Practices. This provenance metadata does not contain entity specific information. | HTML | 09/25/26 | |
Full Metadata A link to the original metadata web page on the EDI Portal | HTML | 09/25/26 | |
Dataset Quality Report A link to the EDI Quality Metadata Page | HTML | 09/25/26 |
More details
Tags
- Chinook Salmon
- Delta Smelt
- Longfin Smelt
- Splittail
- Tule Perch
- benthic invertebrates
- california department of fish and wildlife
- chlorophyll
- cyanobacteria
- diatom
- emergent aquatic vegetation
- estuaries
- floating aquatic vegetation
- food webs
- nutrients
- phytoplankton
- restoration
- salmon rearing
- submerged aquatic vegetation
- submersed aquatic vegetation
- tidal wetland
- water quality
- zooplankton