<p>Records of inspections of wastewater facilities</p>


Wastewater Facilities Inspection Records - 1987 through 2021

Surface Water - Water Quality Regulated Facility Information

System generated identifier of record representing the site that was inspected.

Inspected Facility ID

Facility Name

Organization responsible for the inspected site.

Agency Name

This field categorizes the site that was inspected according to the primary activity of that site. Place types are further categorized into more descriptive categories.

Place Type

This field displays the lowest level of categorization that describes the primary activity at the site inspected.

Place Subtype

Describes the type of organization. The options are:
City Agency - An organization that is part of a city’s government.
Community Organization - A non-governmental organization, including, but not limited to Home-owners associations.
County Agency - An organization that is part of a county’s government.  This classification includes but is not limited to County Service Areas (CSA).
Federal Agency - An organization that is part of the federal government.
Government Agency Combination - An organization that is a collaboration of different public groups.  This classification includes, but is not limited to joint powers agency
Private-Individual - This classification describes people that are acting as organizations.  For example, this is appropriate when a person owns a construction site that requires a general storm water permit.
Privately-Owned Business - An organization that is not part of a government and not an individual.  This classification includes, but is not limited to companies such as Shell, Pacific Gas & Electric, or mutual water companies.
Special District - This is a type of organization defined by regulation and includes, but is not limited to municipal water districts, drainage districts, school districts, and water districts that serve county areas.  “County” may be in the organization’s name but it is not part of the county government.
State Agency - An organization that is part of state government.
Water Board - Either the State Water Resource Control Board or one of the Regional Water Quality Control Boards.  


Agency Type

Street number, street direction, and street type of inspected site.

Place Address

City within which inspected site is located.

Place City

Zip code to which inspected site is associated.

Place Zip

County within which inspected site is located.

Place County

Latitude used to map the site, expressed in degrees.

Place Latitude

Longitude used to map the site, expressed in degrees.

Place Longitude

Identification number associated with a discharge. 

Waste Discharge Identification Number

Identification number associated to a regulatory measure, which is an action taken by the Water Board or staff, that the inspction is checking d

Regulatory Measure ID

The type of regulatory measure (such as permit, order, certification, enrollment under a general order) that the inspection is assessing compliance with.

Regulatory Measure Type

System generated identifier representing a site visit.

Inspection ID

A categorization of inspections that indicates what the inspector did at the site (responded to a complaint, took samples, etc.)


Inspection Type

Date that the site visit started. Most inspections are no more than a day, but they can be multiple days.

Inspection Date Actual Start

The Water Boards has divided its workload into regulatory programs that are distinguishable by the type of discharge. The “program” field is the most discrete division.

Inspection Program

The Water Boards has divided its workload into regulatory programs that are distinguishable by the type of discharge. Each program category is further divided, which is found in the “program” field.

Inspection Program Category

The summary field contains the most important points of the inspection.

Summary

Constructed latitude and longitude of the station sampled.

Location

surface-water-water-quality-regulated-facility-information

On 10/11/12,, the subject facility (Dairy) was inspected to assess compliance with the Waste Discharge Requirements General Order for Existing Milk Dairies, Order No. R5-2007-0035 (General Order) and accompanying Monitoring and Reporting Program.  The inspection was conducted by reviewing record keeping documents and observing conditions of the animal housing facilities, feed and waste storage areas, wastewater retention ponds, and Dairy cropland from public roads and facility access ways.

On 09/28/12, the subject facility (Dairy) was inspected to assess compliance with the Waste Discharge Requirements General Order for Existing Milk Dairies, Order No. R5-2007-0035 (General Order) and accompanying Monitoring and Reporting Program.  The inspection was conducted by reviewing record keeping documents and observing conditions of the animal housing facilities, feed and waste storage areas, wastewater retention ponds, and Dairy cropland from public roads and facility access ways.

The soil samples were transported to Excel Chemical Laboratories in Rocklin on October 18, 2012, for PAH analysis using EPA method 8310.  Results of the soil analyses are still pending.  The soil cap appeared to be in good condition.  No violations were noted.

Discharger plans to rehab the existing Hugo well.  No discharge to the storm drain were observed during the inspection.

Construction activities were on progress at the site. No discharges to the storm drain were observed during the inspection.

Construction activities was in progress. No discharges to the storm drain were observed during the inspection.

Discharger plans to expand existing storm drain system. No discharges to the storm drain were observed during the inspection.

The site is in good condition. Some windblown wastes were noted on the slopes. Cleaning crew was in the process of clean up.

The site is in good condition.  Lush vegetation was observed on the landfill.

The site was in good condition.  Hanson yard still on the landfill.

The site was in good condition.  Large stockpiles are stored at the site.

After post harvest inspection.  Looked at some map points.

A bore-hole was observed drilled through the faility's engineered waste pile pad, which needs to be repaired to prevent infiltration of surface water runoff or possibly leachate to underlying soils and/or groundwater.

No violations observed. Main purspose was to assess Discharger's implementation of stormwater best management practices given the start of the wet-weather season.

Water Board staff toured Ridgemark I WWTP. They are finalizing the installation of their new SBR system. They are 75% complete. Preliminary testing indicates excellent treatment results. No violations observed.

Wastewater appears to be leaking from the ponds, creating standing wastewater, a violation of General Specificaiton B.16.

Module M1 final in interim cover in good condition, well-vegetated, no observed erosoin.  Module M2 has been filled almost to groun level in most areas.  Main sedmientation basin is almost empty.  No problem areas found.

Final cover well-vegetated and in good condition. Monitoring well MW-2 and two lysimeters were unlocked.  Dead vegetation blocking one drainage grate.

Final Cover well-vegetated and in good condition.  Monitoring well MW-4 unlocked.

Final cover on grit and screenings landfill well-vegetated and in good condition. Final cover on closed DLDs very well vegetated. Lined DLDs are inactive for the winter and are relatively dry. SSBs have adequate freeboard.

I inspected the subject facility (Dairy) to assess compliance with the Waste Discharge Requirements General Order for Existing Milk Cow Dairies, Order No. R5-2007-0035 (General Order).  The inspection was conducted by a cursory review of record keeping documents and observing the conditions of the animal housing facilities, feed and waste storage areas, and wastewater retention ponds from public roads and facility access ways.

Discharge did not begin the project.  No discharges to the storm drain were observed during the inspeciton.

GW treatment and discharge operations were ceased. Discharger is pursuing interim rem. actions to max mass removal using mulitple wells for dual-phase and vapor extraction methods under separate Order from RB4. Ceased GW discharge to the storm drain.

Landfill final cover well-vegetated and in good condition. New LFG probes and extraction wells installed along east side. Drainage problem at NE corner of landfill.

RB4 staff conducted a routine site visit before  the upcoming NPDES permit renewal. See attached report and photos.

No more discharge to the storm drain.  Discharge was diverted to the sanitary sewer since 12/2/10.

GW dewatering project was completed at the project site.  No discharges were observed at the site.

No discharge to the storm drain at this time.

Recently graded road 6,000 feet long  observed north of Rockwood Canyon adjacent to Guejito Creek resulted in sediment discharges to Creek and tributaries. Road width approx. 20 to 100 feet wide. A discharge of fill occurred in a minimum of 5 tributaries to Guejito Ck. where road grading crossed waters of the U.S. The natural flows of all five unnamed drainages have been obstructed by the placement of fill within the stream channels.

Some improvements in BMPs and some disregard or lack of knowledge regarding permits conditions. Overall there was still a lack of complaince that needs to be addressed.

No violations were noted during this site inspection.

The site is in good condition.  Keith elliot of Stormwater was also present during the inspection for approval of the site's stormwater permit termination.

Colton landfill was in good condition.  No areas of ponding or concern were identified.

The site appears in good condition.  a short stockpile of rocks was noted on the landfill.

No violations were noted during site inspections.

No violations were noted during this inspection.

N o inspections noted.  However, we may have to foolow-up on the process once the process begins.  may have some issues with weater softener brine reject water.

Building has been completed. No discharge observed.

no violations noted.  well water is treated with the use of an RO.  Brine from the RO unit is collected and comingled with greenhouse condensate, and other fresh water sources.  The reject water is discharges by spray irrigation to a nearby field for cattle grazing.

No violations were noted at the time of the inspection.

No discharges nor violations were observed during the site visit.  See attached report.

Project includes installation of a new fire water line throughout the campus, with some new domestic water lines. Permit application is to discharge the water required to flush and test the newly installed pipe. No discharges were observed during inspection

No violations noted during this site inspection.

No violations were noted.  One ion exchange vessel was under repair at the time of inspection.

Wastewater Facilities Inspection Records - 1987 through 2021

Preview

Data preview

Data dictionary

API endpoint

Dataset Name